11/10/2008

John McCain's message to his supporters.

11/07/2008:

Cindy and I would like to take a moment to thank you for your loyal and steadfast support during the course of this campaign. Governor Palin, her husband Todd, our families, friends and campaign staff extend our deep appreciation for your tireless dedication, support and friendship.

It is the end of a long journey and your support through the ups and downs has meant more to us than you may ever know.

Although we were disappointed with the results, we must move beyond this campaign and work together to get our country moving again.

It is our sincere hope that you will join us in putting our country first and continue to work to keep our nation safe, free and prosperous.

We urge you to join us in not just congratulating Senator Obama, but offering our next president our good will and earnest effort to find ways to come together as a nation. Whatever our differences may be, we are all fellow Americans.

We are truly blessed to live in this great country and call ourselves Americans, and we will forever be her loyal servants.

Today, let there be no reason now for any American to fail to cherish their citizenship in this, the greatest nation on Earth.

With warm gratitude,

Cindy and John McCain

Senator John McCain's election night remarks.

Always a class act, always a patriot:

Remarks from Senator John McCain
November 4, 2008


Thank you. Thank you, my friends. Thank you for coming here on this beautiful Arizona evening.

My friends, we have -- we have come to the end of a long journey. The American people have spoken, and they have spoken clearly. A little while ago, I had the honor of calling Senator Barack Obama to congratulate him on being elected the next president of the country that we both love.

In a contest as long and difficult as this campaign has been, his success alone commands my respect for his ability and perseverance. But that he managed to do so by inspiring the hopes of so many millions of Americans who had once wrongly believed that they had little at stake or little influence in the election of an American president is something I deeply admire and commend him for achieving.

This is an historic election, and I recognize the special significance it has for African-Americans and for the special pride that must be theirs tonight.

I've always believed that America offers opportunities to all who have the industry and will to seize it. Senator Obama believes that, too. But we both recognize that though we have come a long way from the old injustices that once stained our nation's reputation and denied some Americans the full blessings of American citizenship, the memory of them still had the power to wound.

A century ago, President Theodore Roosevelt's invitation of Booker T. Washington to dine at the White House was taken as an outrage in many quarters. America today is a world away from the cruel and prideful bigotry of that time. There is no better evidence of this than the election of an African American to the presidency of the United States. Let there be no reason now for any American to fail to cherish their citizenship in this, the greatest nation on Earth.

Senator Obama has achieved a great thing for himself and for his country. I applaud him for it, and offer in my sincere sympathy that his beloved grandmother did not live to see this day, though our faith assures us she is at rest in the presence of her creator and so very proud of the good man she helped raise.

Senator Obama and I have had and argued our differences, and he has prevailed. No doubt many of those differences remain. These are difficult times for our country, and I pledge to him tonight to do all in my power to help him lead us through the many challenges we face.

I urge all Americans who supported me to join me in not just congratulating him, but offering our next president our good will and earnest effort to find ways to come together, to find the necessary compromises, to bridge our differences, and help restore our prosperity, defend our security in a dangerous world, and leave our children and grandchildren a stronger, better country than we inherited.

Whatever our differences, we are fellow Americans. And please believe me when I say no association has ever meant more to me than that.

It is natural tonight to feel some disappointment, but tomorrow we must move beyond it and work together to get our country moving again. We fought as hard as we could.

And though we fell short, the failure is mine, not yours.

I am so deeply grateful to all of you for the great honor of your support and for all you have done for me. I wish the outcome had been different, my friends. The road was a difficult one from the outset. But your support and friendship never wavered. I cannot adequately express how deeply indebted I am to you.

I am especially grateful to my wife, Cindy, my children, my dear mother and all my family and to the many old and dear friends who have stood by my side through the many ups and downs of this long campaign. I have always been a fortunate man, and never more so for the love and encouragement you have given me.

You know, campaigns are often harder on a candidate's family than on the candidate, and that's been true in this campaign. All I can offer in compensation is my love and gratitude, and the promise of more peaceful years ahead.

I am also, of course, very thankful to Governor Sarah Palin, one of the best campaigners I have ever seen and an impressive new voice in our party for reform and the principles that have always been our greatest strength. Her husband Todd and their five beautiful children with their tireless dedication to our cause, and the courage and grace they showed in the rough-and-tumble of a presidential campaign. We can all look forward with great interest to her future service to Alaska, the Republican Party and our country.

To all my campaign comrades, from Rick Davis and Steve Schmidt and Mark Salter, to every last volunteer who fought so hard and valiantly month after month in what at times seemed to be the most challenged campaign in modern times, thank you so much. A lost election will never mean more to me than the privilege of your faith and friendship.

I don't know what more we could have done to try to win this election. I'll leave that to others to determine. Every candidate makes mistakes, and I'm sure I made my share of them. But I won't spend a moment of the future regretting what might have been.

This campaign was and will remain the great honor of my life. And my heart is filled with nothing but gratitude for the experience and to the American people for giving me a fair hearing before deciding that Senator Obama and my old friend Senator Joe Biden should have the honor of leading us for the next four years.

I would not be an American worthy of the name, should I regret a fate that has allowed me the extraordinary privilege of serving this country for a half a century. Today, I was a candidate for the highest office in the country I love so much. And tonight, I remain her servant. That is blessing enough for anyone and I thank the people of Arizona for it.

Tonight, more than any night, I hold in my heart nothing but love for this country and for all its citizens, whether they supported me or Senator Obama, I wish Godspeed to the man who was my former opponent and will be my president.

And I call on all Americans, as I have often in this campaign, to not despair of our present difficulties but to believe always in the promise and greatness of America, because nothing is inevitable here.

Americans never quit. We never surrender. We never hide from history, we make history.

Thank you, and God bless you, and God bless America. Thank you all very much.

http://www.johnmccain.com/splash110408.htm

11/03/2008

Ohio Coal Association: Obama Ticket Not Supportive of Coal.

Ohio Coal Association Says Obama Remarks Make It Clear: Obama Ticket Not Supportive of Coal:

Mike Carey, president of the Ohio Coal Association (OCA), today issued the following statement in response to just-released remarks from Senator Barack Obama about the nation's coal industry:

"Regardless of the timing or method of the release of these remarks, the message from the Democratic candidate for President could not be clearer: the Obama-Biden ticket spells disaster for America's coal industry and the tens of thousands of Americans who work in it.

"These undisputed, audio-taped remarks, which include comments from Senator Obama like 'I haven't been some coal booster' and 'if they want to build [coal plants], they can, but it will bankrupt them' are extraordinarily misguided.

"It's evident that this campaign has been pandering in states like Ohio, Virginia, West Virginia, Indiana and Pennsylvania to attempt to generate votes from coal supporters, while keeping his true agenda hidden from the state's voters."

Complete story here

Obama to Pennsylvania, Ohio and Indiana: I promise to bankrupt your coal industry.

An important update from our good friends at Faultline USA. Barack Obama is promising to bankrupt (his exact words) the US coal industry.

Barack Obama in a January 17, 2008 interview with the San Francisco Chronicle:

"Let me sort of describe my overall policy. What I've said is that we would put a cap and trade system in place that is as aggressive, if not more aggressive, than anybody else's out there. . .

So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted. . ."


Complete story: http://faultlineusa.blogspot.com/2008/11/obamas-words-on-bankrupting-coal.html

11/02/2008

Newt Gingrich on why John McCain is better for AMERICA.

Newt Gingrich on McCain/Palin:

"THERE are profound reasons to believe the McCain-Palin ticket offers a better future for most Americans than the Obama-Biden ticket.

John McCain can be expected to appoint judges who respect the vital role that religion has historically played in American public life.

In a bad economy, McCain would focus on economic growth and job creation. Obama has promised to focus on "spreading your wealth."

Watching the ACORN organization come under investigation in more than a dozen states for voter fraud and illegality, it is sobering to imagine what Obama, a former ACORN trainer and community organizer, would do to give even more of our tax money to this hard-left, corrupt organization. It is also unlikely an Obama Justice Department would prosecute any of the donor-fraud and voter-fraud allegations that are rapidly building up.

The recent stories about Obama's friendship with apologists for terrorism are a reminder that we really do not know how radical an Obama administration would be. We do know he has promised to meet with every dictator and anti-American regime. McCain's record on these issues is far sounder.

Finally, on the vice presidency, it is revealing that no national network TV interviewer asked Gov. Sarah Palin about her experiences as governor; her experience writing an $11 billion state budget; her experience leading the 29,000 employees of the Alaskan state government; her experience negotiating a big deal with ExxonMobil, Shell, BP and the rest of Big Oil; her success in giving the money from that negotiation to the people of Alaska as a $1,300 tax cut for every man, woman and child in the state; or her experience in negotiating a natural-gas pipeline that is the biggest civil-construction project in North America, and which three former governors failed to get done.

For these reasons and more, the McCain-Palin ticket would lead to a much better future for America than Obama-Biden."


Newt Gingrich, speaker of the House from 1995 to 1999, is the author of "Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less."

Please read the complete NY Post article here

The race gets even tighter in Michigan and across the USA!!!

What's happening in Michigan is happening in your state too. The momentum is shifting our way across the country. Spread the word and keep the McCain/Palin faith!

"In Michigan, the latest Detroit News/EPIC-MRA poll shows Obama currently only has 50% of the vote, and if Undecideds break for McCain, Obama's lead would be only 2%.  If Obama loses a point or two from his 50% standing he will likely lose this state and its 17 Electoral Votes!!

This poll was taken one-week ago, and our data indicates the race has gotten even closer.  Rassmussen Reports also shows a tightening of the race.  With the national Zogby 1-day tracking poll showing McCain pulling ahead of Obama on Friday, it is clear the momentum is with McCain/Palin.

We believe Michigan is very much in play.  Polls likely over-sample Obama supporters and also probably include a few percentage points of artificial support from those voters intimidated to say they are voting for McCain given the media's campaign to portray McCain supporters as being "racist" or "intolerant."  And there is no early voting in Michigan, so we can still catch Obama by Tuesday!

Since there is NO early voting in Michigan, we have the chance to impact this race over the next 3 days and gain the lead for McCain/Palin!"

Source: http://www.ourcountrydeservesbetter.com/

10/27/2008

Still a CLOSE race!!

Some very good news to report, friends!  The poll that was most accurate in calling the 2004 presidential election, the IBD-TIPP poll, shows McCain has narrowed Obama's lead for the past 3 days and it's now down to just 2.8% with 8.8% of voters still undecided!

Friends -- we can make up 2.8% in the polls and win this race!

Link: http://www.ourcountrydeservesbetter.com/

10/22/2008

Military Times poll: Troops backing McCain

No surprise here. Fully 68% of  those polled support John McCain. These are Americans who are fighting for us every day and  they are overwhelmingly in the McCain camp. That says volumes about who John McCain is and what he means when he says "Country First". Our troops live "Country First" every day.

Military Times poll: Troops backing McCain:

"McCain, R-Ariz., handily defeated Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., 68 percent to 23 percent in a voluntary survey of 4,293 active-duty, National Guard and reserve subscribers and former subscribers to Army Times, Navy Times, Marine Corps Times and Air Force Times."

"John McCain went to war for this country, even though he had an admiral father who probably could have gotten him out of the service,” Army Sgt. 1st Class Derriel D. Collins said. “He stuck it out five years in a prisoner of war camp. If that ain’t fortitude, showing your willingness to go all the way, I don’t know what the credentials are."

Full story linked here.


10/21/2008

This is going to be a CLOSE election.

Do not buy into the Mainstream Media's sickeningly endless pro-Obama propaganda machine!

The Battleground Poll's latest results are as follows:


McCain 47%  Obama 48%  Undecided 6%


THIS RACE IS NOT OVER!


Poll results: http://www.tarrance.com/files/2-way-ballot-trender-10-20.pdf  (pdf 208 kb)

Battleground Poll website: http://www.tarrance.com/bg.cfm

Click here for Rush Limbaugh on Battleground Poll

10/17/2008

Fight ACORN, get this voter ID petition out NOW!!

Once again, the democrats are trying to steal a presidential election. This time it's Obama's favorite radical group ACORN doing the dirty work.

Emergency Voter Identification petition. You can sign and they'll send an email to your congresspersons. It's important that you sign and let our congresspersons be flooded with email telling them we're fed up with people wanting to steal the election!
 
Click here to sign the petition and please forward this to as many people as possible!

Ain't it the truth!

A Democratic operative pointed out that when Obama holds a rally 25,000 - 30,000 people show up, whereas when McCain holds one he only draws 10,000 - 15,000.

The Republican spokesman replied -

"That's because McCain's supporters are at work."



Obama Flees Michigan: WE STRIKE NOW!

ALERT - October 17, 2008

We're writing to you from our tour bus, having just finished our "Stop Obama Tour" rally in Henderson, Nevada.  We have some very important news to alert you to.

The Detroit News and other media outlets are reporting that Barack Obama's campaign is pulling staff and advertising from Michigan.  They have created a huge opening for us to come in and take this state away from the Obama column and win the state's hugely important 17 electoral votes for the McCain/Palin ticket.

We are pleased to announce our first $100,000 purchase of TV ads has been placed in Michigan, with the ads beginning on Monday in 5 markets.  And another $100,000 worth of ads will start on Tuesday, expanding into the rest of the state.  And we have even more ads to come after that.

BARACK OBAMA'S COCKINESS WILL COST HIM THIS STATE:  WE ARE GOING TO WIN MICHIGAN FOR THE McCAIN/PALIN CAMPAIGN!

These three ads below are the first three ads that will run in the state.  

Here's the first ad everyone's talking about with reporting on the anti-Obama ad appearing on Fox News Channel, CNN, CBS News, Time Magazine's political report, "The Page", the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, National Journal, New York Newsday, and several other media outlets:

WATCH "OBAMA'S WRONG VALUES" - HERE

The next ad is being run specifically in Michigan - where the Obama campaign has now followed the McCain campaign in pulling resources out of the state.  This means the state of Michigan is now "in play" -- if we can raise enough money, we can turn the tide and erase the lead Obama's campaign had built over the past 2 weeks.  The ad features Obama's connections to such controversial and corrupt figures including domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, anti-American and racist pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and the scandal-plagued former Mayor of Detroit, Kwame Kilpatrick:

WATCH AD ON OBAMA'S TIES TO AYERS, WRIGHT, KILPATRICK

And finally this ad below which has begun to run in key swing states and has been denounced by Obama supporters.  The reason they are upset?  It features Sen. Hillary Clinton ripping into Obama on a host of fronts, and could swing Independents and Democrats into the McCain camp in the final days before the election.

WATCH AD: HILLARY RIPS OBAMA - HERE

PLEASE - make a contribution to our ad campaign fund so we can expand this ad buy to other states beyond Nevada, Colorado and Michigan (the first 3 states we've bought time for the ad which represent 31 Electoral Votes).  

P.S. We have officially launched our "Stop Obama Tour" across the nation.  We need to get crowds out to these events, especially with the heightened media interest in our effort now building.  Full tour details - HERE.

10/06/2008

TO ALL BLOGS

Here is your chance to speak up for Sarah Palin! It takes 5 seconds!

Let's turn this around!!!

Friends,

PBS has a short video on Sarah Palin on their website. Also included is a poll that asks: Is Sarah Palin qualified to be VP?
I logged on a few minutes ago and 49% percent had voted YES, 50% NO.
 
Let's turn this around..... You don't have to give your name or email address in order to vote. It's very simple. Forward this to your friends as well.  This is a liberal netowrk with a liberal audience.
Let's surprise them! 

Here 's the link to the poll:  http://www.pbs.org/now/polls/poll-435.html

After you vote, please pass this message to others of like mind!

9/21/2008

Obama attempts to undermine the United States in Iraq.

Barack Obama. The man from nowhere, the man ashamed of America and American power, the man with a huge 150 days of Senate experience has lowered himself further by his despicable attempts to undermine the United States when he was on his Obama World Tour back in July.

Amir Tehiri:

WHILE campaigning in public for a speedy withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.

Obama has given Iraqis the impression that he doesn't want Iraq to appear anything like a success, let alone a victory, for America. The reason? He fears that the perception of US victory there might revive the Bush Doctrine of "pre-emptive" war - that is, removing a threat before it strikes at America.

Despite some usual equivocations on the subject, Obama rejects pre-emption as a legitimate form of self -defense. To be credible, his foreign-policy philosophy requires Iraq to be seen as a failure, a disaster, a quagmire, a pig with lipstick or any of the other apocalyptic adjectives used by the American defeat industry in the past five years.

Yet Iraq is doing much better than its friends hoped and its enemies feared. The UN mandate will be extended in December, and we may yet get an agreement on the status of forces before President Bush leaves the White House in January.

Amir Tehiri column

Amir Tehiri defends his column after Obama hacks complain

9/13/2008

New York Post endorses McCain-Palin

The New York Post has endorsed John McCain for President of the United States. Here are some important excerpts from their endorsement:

McCain's lifelong record of service to America, his battle-tested courage, unshakable devotion to principle and clear grasp of the dangers and opportunities now facing the nation stand in dramatic contrast to the tissue-paper-thin résumé of his Democratic opponent, freshman Sen. Barack Obama.


National Security: The differences between McCain and Obama are especially stark.

McCain says 9/11 represented a two-decade "failure . . . to respond to . . . a [growing] global terror network." He understood that Iraq is a critical front in the war on terror - and he urged perseverance even in the dark days that preceded the success of "the surge."

Obama backed policies that would have abandoned Iraq to its fate, he bitterly opposed the surge, and once insisted that US forces invade Pakistan in search of Osama bin Laden - seemingly without regard for the potential consequences of attacking a nuclear-armed nation, ally or not.

Regarding a nuclear Iran, McCain has pushed for the strongest possible international sanctions and diplomatic pressure. Obama opposes sanctions.

And, when Russia invaded the former Soviet republic of Georgia, threatening a return to the Cold War, McCain reacted with stern disapprobation: "We must remind Russia's leaders that the benefits they enjoy from being part of the civilized world require their respect for the values, stability and peace of that world."

Obama called for UN action - unaware, apparently, that Russia's Security Council veto would have prevented any.

Energy Security: On the economic issue most vexing Americans today - energy prices - McCain is aggressive

He is a strong convert to offshore drilling: "We have trillions of dollars' worth of oil and gas reserves in the US at a time we are exporting hundreds of billions of dollars a year overseas to buy energy."

He also strongly backs nuclear power - a carbon-free form of energy that America can produce relatively cheaply.

Obama, meanwhile, hews to the Democratic Party line on energy: no nukes, no drilling and no comprehension of the consequences of such policies.

None of this implies an iota of disrespect toward Obama. It took a formidable candidacy to defeat Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. And the intelligence, the organizational skills and the ability to communicate that Obama demonstrated from the beginning dramatically underscore the history that is being made by the first African-American to head a major-party presidential ticket.

He should be around for a long time, and we hope that he is.

In the end, though, sound security, economic and energy policies - plus allegiance to principle - are critical to keeping America safe and strong.

Complete editorial linked here.

8/20/2008

McCain in 5-point lead over Obama in Reuters/Zogby poll.

Americans are starting to pay attention to this election. Note how John McCain is solidifying the support of his base while Obama's base is fracturing.

Some key points:

McCain leads Obama among likely U.S. voters by 46 percent to 41 percent, wiping out Obama's solid 7-point advantage in July and taking his first lead in the monthly Reuters/Zogby poll.

The poll was taken Thursday 8/14 through Saturday 8/16 as Obama wrapped up a weeklong vacation in Hawaii that ceded the political spotlight to McCain, who seized on Russia's invasion of Georgia to emphasize his foreign policy views.

McCain now has a 9-point edge, 49 percent to 40 percent, over Obama on the critical question of who would be the best manager of the economy -- an issue nearly half of voters said was their top concern in the November 4 presidential election. That margin reversed Obama's 4-point edge last month on the economy over McCain.

Obama's support among Democrats fell 9 percentage points this month to 74 percent, while McCain has the backing of 81 percent of Republicans. Support for Obama, an Illinois senator, fell 12 percentage points among liberals, with 10 percent of liberals still undecided compared to 9 percent of conservatives.

"Conservatives were supposed to be the bigger problem for McCain," Zogby said. "Obama still has work to do on his base. At this point McCain seems to be doing a better job with his base. "The dip in support for Obama cut across demographic and ideological lines. He slipped among Catholics, born-again Christians, women, independents and younger voters.

Obama's support among voters between the ages of 18 and 29, which had been one of his strengths, slipped 12 percentage points to 52 percent. McCain was winning 40 percent of younger voters.

It made little difference when independent candidate Ralph Nader and Libertarian Party candidate Bob Barr, who are both trying to add their names to state ballots. McCain still held a 5-point edge over Obama, 44 percent to 39 percent, when all four names were included. Barr earned 3 percent and Nader 2 percent.


Article linked here

8/15/2008

Putin, Georgia, Russia and McCain.

I just read Garry Kasparov's excellent piece in the Wall Street Journal about Russia's brutal invasion of Georgia. John McCain
has been one of the few to understand what's really going on in Putin's belligerent Russia.

Garry Kasparov:

The conflict also threatens to poison Russia's relationship with Europe and America for years to come. Can such a belligerent state be trusted as the guarantor of Europe's energy supply? Republican presidential candidate John McCain has been derided for his strong stance against Mr. Putin, including a proposal to kick Russia out of the G-8. Will his critics now admit that the man they called an antiquated cold warrior was right all along?

Complete WSJ article linked here.

7/31/2008

McCain poll numbers improve in Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

More interesting results from the latest Quinnipiac University Poll. The race is tightening in Sen. McCain's favor. It looks more and more like McCain's Iraq position and his pro-energy-exploration positions are resonating with the American voter.

Quinnipiac Poll:

"With likely voters concerned more about energy than the war in Iraq, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama’s recent tour apparently didn’t help, as Arizona Sen. John McCain gained on the Democratic front-runner in Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania, according to simultaneous Quinnipiac University Swing State polls released today.


While Obama was on tour, trying to show voters he could handle world affairs, voters were home trying to fill their gas tanks.
 
The same voters who give President George W. Bush job approval ratings that are more than 2 – 1 negative want Congress to go along with the President on offshore oil drilling. By margins of 27 to 30 percentage points, voters in each state say Congress should agree with President George W. Bush and allow offshore drilling for oil. Sen. McCain supports offshore drilling, while Sen. Obama opposes it.


By margins of 10 to 20 percentage points, voters in each state support McCain’s plan to keep U.S. troops in Iraq with no fixed date for full withdrawal, rather than Obama’s plan to set a fixed timetable for withdrawal.

Those who said Sen. McCain was throwing away Florida’s electoral votes by advocating more offshore drilling might want to think again. By a 60 – 33 percent margin Florida voters back President Bush’s call for more offshore drilling and want Congress to go along, as Sen. McCain has suggested.

Pennsylvania voters support 55 – 41 percent drilling for oil in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge.

Ohio voters back 55 – 40 percent drilling for oil in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge."


Complete poll results here.

7/30/2008

McCain ahead in USA Today poll of likely voters.

Encouraging news. Interesting results considering how the Obama camp expected European adulation to translate into better poll numbers here in America, where by the way, the presidential election will be taking place.

"The Friday-Sunday poll, mostly conducted as Obama was returning from his much-publicized overseas trip and released just this hour, shows McCain now ahead 49%-45% among voters that Gallup believes are most likely to go to the polls in November. In late June, he was behind among likely voters, 50%-44%."

"Also, McCain's sharp words about Obama and the media last week may have energized his faithful."


Full story here

7/25/2008

McCain up in 4 key states.

Guess which presidential candidate got a bounce in the polls this week. John McCain! While self-proclaimed "citizen of the world" Barack Obama is on his international photo-op and publicity tour, John McCain is emphasizing the critical importance of domestic oil exploration to the American economy.

"In Colorado, McCain led 46 percent to 44 percent. Obama led in Michigan, 46 percent to 42 percent; by 46 percent to 44 percent in Minnesota and by 50 percent to 39 percent in Wisconsin, according to the polls posted on Quinnipiac University's Web site.

Voters in the four states back offshore drilling by margins of 22 to 31 percentage points. The polls also show voters in those states would support drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge by 7 to 12 percentage points.


The polling data come in a week in which Obama has received heavy news coverage with a trip through war zones, the Mideast and Europe."

Here are the new poll results:

Colorado (9 electoral votes): McCain up 2% to 46%, Obama down 5% to 44% (in June, Obama 49%, McCain 44%).

Michigan (17 electoral votes): Obama down 2% to 46%, McCain steady at 42% (in June, Obama 48%, McCain 42%).

Minnesota (10 electoral votes): Obama down 8% to  46%, McCain up 7% to 44% (in June, Obama 54%, McCain 37%).

Wisconsin (10 electoral votes): Obama down 2% to 50%, McCain steady at 39% (in June, Obama 52%, McCain 39%).

The Quinnipiac release on its poll notes that McCain "has picked up support in almost every group in every state, especially among independent voters and men voters."

Full story links:
Seattle Times
Washington Post

Free Republic

7/21/2008

New York Times: All the Obama-only editorials that we see fit to print.

The collection of left-wing journalists and ex-Clinton administration hacks that calls itself the New York Times has ruled from on high that John McCain's editorial is unfit to print. They gave wonderful excuses, but what it comes down to is that the NYT has become unashamedly all-Obama, all the time.

(To email to the public editor of the New York Times Clark Hoyt: public@nytimes.com but don't expect a reply.)

Here is the text of John McCain's editorial that the New York times was afraid to print. Perhaps the phrase "winning the war" sent them under their desks up at the NYT offices:

In January 2007, when General David Petraeus took command in Iraq, he called the situation “hard” but not “hopeless.” Today, 18 months later, violence has fallen by up to 80% to the lowest levels in four years, and Sunni and Shiite terrorists are reeling from a string of defeats. The situation now is full of hope, but considerable hard work remains to consolidate our fragile gains.

Progress has been due primarily to an increase in the number of troops and a change in their strategy. I was an early advocate of the surge at a time when it had few supporters in Washington. Senator Barack Obama was an equally vocal opponent. "I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is going to solve the sectarian violence there,” he said on January 10, 2007. “In fact, I think it will do the reverse."

Now Senator Obama has been forced to acknowledge that “our troops have performed brilliantly in lowering the level of violence.” But he still denies that any political progress has resulted.

Perhaps he is unaware that the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad has recently certified that, as one news article put it, “Iraq has met all but three of 18 original benchmarks set by Congress last year to measure security, political and economic progress.” Even more heartening has been progress that’s not measured by the benchmarks. More than 90,000 Iraqis, many of them Sunnis who once fought against the government, have signed up as Sons of Iraq to fight against the terrorists. Nor do they measure Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki’s new-found willingness to crack down on Shiite extremists in Basra and Sadr City—actions that have done much to dispel suspicions of sectarianism.

The success of the surge has not changed Senator Obama’s determination to pull out all of our combat troops. All that has changed is his rationale. In a New York Times op-ed and a speech this week, he offered his “plan for Iraq” in advance of his first “fact finding” trip to that country in more than three years. It consisted of the same old proposal to pull all of our troops out within 16 months. In 2007 he wanted to withdraw because he thought the war was lost. If we had taken his advice, it would have been. Now he wants to withdraw because he thinks Iraqis no longer need our assistance.

To make this point, he mangles the evidence. He makes it sound as if Prime Minister Maliki has endorsed the Obama timetable, when all he has said is that he would like a plan for the eventual withdrawal of U.S. troops at some unspecified point in the future.

Senator Obama is also misleading on the Iraqi military's readiness. The Iraqi Army will be equipped and trained by the middle of next year, but this does not, as Senator Obama suggests, mean that they will then be ready to secure their country without a good deal of help. The Iraqi Air Force, for one, still lags behind, and no modern army can operate without air cover. The Iraqis are also still learning how to conduct planning, logistics, command and control, communications, and other complicated functions needed to support frontline troops.

No one favors a permanent U.S. presence, as Senator Obama charges. A partial withdrawal has already occurred with the departure of five “surge” brigades, and more withdrawals can take place as the security situation improves. As we draw down in Iraq, we can beef up our presence on other battlefields, such as Afghanistan, without fear of leaving a failed state behind. I have said that I expect to welcome home most of our troops from Iraq by the end of my first term in office, in 2013.

But I have also said that any draw-downs must be based on a realistic assessment of conditions on the ground, not on an artificial timetable crafted for domestic political reasons. This is the crux of my disagreement with Senator Obama.

Senator Obama has said that he would consult our commanders on the ground and Iraqi leaders, but he did no such thing before releasing his “plan for Iraq.” Perhaps that’s because he doesn’t want to hear what they have to say. During the course of eight visits to Iraq, I have heard many times from our troops what Major General Jeffrey Hammond, commander of coalition forces in Baghdad, recently said: that leaving based on a timetable would be “very dangerous.”

The danger is that extremists supported by Al Qaeda and Iran could stage a comeback, as they have in the past when we’ve had too few troops in Iraq. Senator Obama seems to have learned nothing from recent history. I find it ironic that he is emulating the worst mistake of the Bush administration by waving the “Mission Accomplished” banner prematurely.

I am also dismayed that he never talks about winning the war—only of ending it. But if we don’t win the war, our enemies will. A triumph for the terrorists would be a disaster for us. That is something I will not allow to happen as president. Instead I will continue implementing a proven counterinsurgency strategy not only in Iraq but also in Afghanistan with the goal of creating stable, secure, self-sustaining democratic allies.

Full story linked here

7/10/2008

Obama's mouthpiece Clark denigrates McCain's POW experience.

Wesley Clark is just one more pathetic person doing Obama's dirty work by denigrating John McCain's 5 years as a POW of the communist North Vietnamese. That in itself is not too amazing because Clark has spent his entire post-military career shilling for various anti-military democrats like Bill Clinton, John Kerry and now of course Barack Obama. Make no mistake about it, Clark is more than happy to be Obama's saluting little surrogate. Clark is now Obama's messenger boy, happily spewing forth Obama's words like a marionette.

Previously, Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) had the honor of being Obama's anti-military mouthpiece but now Clark has been promoted to that exalted position, at least for now.

The interesting thing here is that this whole episode is part of the Obama strategy to dismiss John McCain's military career as irrelevant to the Presidency. Obama has to do that to make up for own thin resume when it comes to military and national security issues. He is also using this episode to draw attention away from his lifetime of associations with radicals and radical causes.

The bigger picture is that Obama views the military with contempt. He views your service to America with contempt. The real message he is sending out is that he doesn't value anyone's military service past or present, including those serving right now in Iraq and Afghanistan.

6/22/2008

Who's afraid of John McCain??

Barack Obama has two lists, the first list contains people he can't wait to talk to:

1) Iran's lunatic islamo-fascist dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. His qualifications include lying to the world about his "peaceful" nuclear energy program, frequently threatening US ally Israel with extinction, acquiring medium range missiles to threaten Europe with extinction, supplying Iraqi insurgents with weapons to kill Americans. But besides all that he's an all-around nice guy.

2) North Korea's lunatic communist dictator, Kim Jong Il. His qualifications include threatening US ally South Korea with extinction, lying to the world about his nuclear weapons program, developing medium and long range missiles to threaten the US and Japan with, and supplying dictator #1 with missiles.

The second list contains people he's afraid to talk to or debate in a town hall format or any other format where he's forced to give real unscripted answers to serious questions. This is list is so special it contains just one name in the whole wide world!:

1) John McCain. Republican Senator from Arizona. His disqualifications (in Obama's mind) include supporting our fight in Iraq, supporting our military during his entire career, understanding the deadly nature of threat from Iran and North Korea, realizing that Americans have the right to acquire our own domestic energy sources, and being proud of the United States of America. Besides all that John McCain has ruined many a day for Obama by actually criticizing him, something Obama is very very sensitive about.


6/07/2008

Obama's radical roots.

One of the few verifiable things about Obama's past is that he was a so-called "community organizer" in Illinois. That has such a nice happy ring to it, "community organizer". It brings forth images of a kindly smiling Barack helping out senior citizens and playing basketball with kids in some local school yard. But when we look a little close we see that Obama was deeply involved with one of the most left-wing groups in America - Acorn.

Stanley Kurtz:
What if Barack Obama’s most important radical connection has been hiding in plain sight all along? Obama has had an intimate and long-term association with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (Acorn), the largest radical group in America. If I told you Obama had close ties with MoveOn.org or Code Pink, you’d know what I was talking about. Acorn is at least as radical as these better-known groups, arguably more so. Yet because Acorn works locally, in carefully selected urban areas, its national profile is lower. Acorn likes it that way. And so, I’d wager, does Barack Obama.

Obama’s ties to Acorn — arguably the most politically radical large-scale activist group in the country — are wide, deep, and longstanding. If Acorn is adept at creating a non-partisan, inside-game veneer for what is in fact an intensely radical, leftist, and politically partisan reality, so is Obama himself. This is hardly a coincidence: Obama helped train Acorn’s leaders in how to play this game. For the most part, Obama seems to have favored the political-insider strategy, yet it’s clear that he knew how to play the in-your-face “direct action” game as well. And surely during his many years of close association with Acorn, Obama had to know what the group was all about.
 
Acorn is a well-organized group of  belligerent urban radicals with a solid anti-business, anti-growth agenda. Their tactics frequently include the intimidation of elected officials and police.

Stanley Kurtz:

200 Acorn protesters tried to storm the Chicago City Council session. According to the Chicago Daily Herald, Acorn demonstrators pushed over the metal detector and table used to screen visitors, backed police against the doors to the council chamber, and blocked late-arriving aldermen and city staff from entering the session.

We are starting to see what Obama's has always been about. His endless use of the word "change" is a smokescreen for his radical and destructive agenda for the USA. An agenda hiding behind that smile.

Stanley Kurtz column

Steve Malanga column

6/01/2008

Talk to the enemy?

The Iranians and North Koreans would love to sit down over coffee with Obama. Why? Because they see in him a very naive, pliable president. Obama wants to talk because he's Obama. It's that simple. No forethought as to any potential catastrophic consequences for the United States even enters into his mind. Obama's candidacy is one large photo-op in front of his adoring American media. For Obama the substance of any talks would be secondary to the experience of the ultimate world-wide media photo-op that such an ill-advised journey would turn into. The interests of the U.S. are a mere distraction for Obama and the Democrats. The development of an Iranian nuclear bomb would just be a bad news day for Obama.

I'm also not buying the comparison of Reagan talking to the Soviets either. Big difference. The Soviets wanted to live. As bad as they were, they understood what a nuclear attack on the US would mean to them. It meant that they would be on the receiving end of our nuclear missiles.

The Iranians would be willing to die, or rather the Iranian leadership would be quite willing to sacrifice Iranian lives in a nuclear conflict.

Sometimes talking to the enemy does work. In 1945 President Truman through Generals Eisenhower and MacArthur, talked to Germany and Japan, telling them where to sign the surrender documents.

Rich Lowry column